Log in Request access

About

Mechanical engineering deserves better than plausible answers.

Physical products fail at specific temperatures, loads, interfaces, tolerances, and life conditions. Howard exists to help engineers make those conditions explicit, connect calculations to evidence, and preserve why a decision was made.

What we believe

A refusal can be more valuable than an estimate.

Plausible numbers are dangerous when the source does not apply. Howard is built to expose the missing evidence rather than make an unsupported decision feel complete.

The engineer owns the judgment.

Howard can structure, calculate, compare, cite, and challenge. It cannot own requirements, accept risk, release a design, or replace competent review and physical validation.

Howard doesThe engineer does
Structure the problem and its conditionsOwn the requirements
Calculate, compare, and citeAccept the risk
Challenge assumptions and name missing evidenceRelease the design
Preserve the argument across revisionsRun competent review and physical validation

The argument should evolve with the product.

Requirements, assumptions, calculations, supplier evidence, and test results belong in one revision history — not scattered across chats and spreadsheets.

Request access.

Tell us what the product must do and the condition it must survive. We will tell you whether Howard can support the problem honestly.