Security
Howard handles early requirements, calculations, files, test evidence, and design rationale. Security copy must therefore describe concrete controls and contractual commitments — not ask engineering teams to accept a generic trust statement.
Verified statement
Howard does not use your project threads, files, revisions, inputs, or outputs to train shared models.
Project isolation
Project context is available only to authorized members of that project. The authorization model, administrator controls, and audit behavior are published here once verified; until then they are covered in the security brief rather than summarized on a marketing page.
Data lifecycle and controls
This table is the whole security posture, including the parts that are not finished. A control is listed as in force only where it has been verified; everything else is named as outstanding rather than left off the page, and is answered directly in the security brief.
| Control | What it covers | State |
|---|---|---|
| Training use | Project threads, files, revisions, inputs, and outputs are not used to train shared models. | In force |
| Project isolation | Project context available only to authorized members of that project. | In force |
| Hosting and processing regions | Where project data is stored and where it is processed. | In the brief |
| Encryption in transit and at rest | Transport and storage protection for project data. | In the brief |
| Retention and deletion | Retention defaults and what deletion actually removes. | In the brief |
| Backups and deletion propagation | Backup retention, and how a deletion reaches backups. | In the brief |
| Subprocessors and model providers | Who processes project data, and whether providers hold zero-retention terms. | In the brief |
| Staff access and support-access logging | Which staff can reach project data, and what is logged when they do. | In the brief |
| SSO and role-based access | Enterprise identity and permission control. | Not yet published |
| Audit logs, IP restrictions, legal hold | Administrative visibility and access constraints. | Not yet published |
| Data export | Getting project work back out in a usable form. | Not yet published |
| Independent testing | External verification of the controls above. | Not yet published |
Howard does not borrow another vendor’s claims, certifications, or terminology. A control appears on this page as in force only when Howard has the audited control itself.
Enterprise controls
SSO, role-based access, audit logs, IP restrictions, data export, legal hold, and independent testing belong on this page only after implementation and verification. Until then, the answer is a concise security brief and a direct technical contact — not a roadmap presented as a control.
Incident handling
A security response path is only useful if it is written down before it is needed. The security contact, reporting channel, acknowledgement target, incident-notification commitment, and public status location are stated in the security brief and confirmed at the point of access.
The security brief answers the lifecycle questions above directly, with a technical contact attached.